THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASES OF DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE IN WORKING WITH INFORMATION
Abdullayev Elmurod Zaylobiddinovich, Basic doctoral student, Andijan State University
Keywords:
information competence, information literacy, students, theoretical foundations,, methodological approaches, critical thinking, digital literacy, educational curriculum, teaching methodologies, assessment toolsAbstract
The rapid advancement of technology and the ever-increasing availability of information have necessitated the development of students’ competence in working with information. This article explores the theoretical and methodological foundations for enhancing students’ information literacy skills. The study investigates various approaches and strategies to empower students in effectively accessing, evaluating, and utilizing information. The article emphasizes the importance of promoting critical thinking, digital literacy, and information evaluation skills among students. The results highlight the significance of integrating information literacy into the educational curriculum, along with the need for appropriate teaching methodologies and assessment tools. The findings provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and researchers seeking to enhance students’ competence in working with information.
References
Bruce, C. (2017). Seven faces of information literacy in higher education. World Library and Information Congress: 83rd IFLA General Conference and Assembly.
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432-448.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press. 4. Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4).
Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age. ELH, 73(2), 253-269.
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2017). Student agency and information practices: Examining the role of privacy in a post-Snowden context. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5), 1004- 1018.
UNESCO. (2005). Information literacy competency standards for higher education.
Wang, J., Wang, W., Liu, Q., Wang, M., Zhao, Y., & Li, J. (2017). A review of research on digital literacy assessment tools. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 112-126.
Xie, Y., & Bugg, J. M. (2009). Internet use and health among college students: Are they engaged in risky online behaviors? Journal of American College Health, 58(2), 111-118.
Zhu, E. (2012). Information literacy policy development in Chinese universities: A case study of Tsinghua University Library. Library & Information Science Research, 34(4), 295-302.
Kollej va ilmiy kutubxonalar uyushmasi. (2016). Oliy taʼlim uchun axborot savodxonligi asoslari. Amerika kutubxonalar uyushmasi.
Eisenberg, MB va Berkowitz, RE (1990). Axborot muammolarini hal qilish: Kutubxona va axborot ko’nikmalariga oid katta oltita ko’nikmalarga yondashuv. Ablex nashriyot korporatsiyasi.
Kuhlthau, CC (2004). Ma’noni izlash: Kutubxona va axborot xizmatlariga jarayon yondashuvi. Kutubxonalar cheksiz.
Lloyd, A. (2010). Axborot savodxonligi manzaralari: ta’lim, ish joyi va kundalik kontekstda axborot savodxonligi. Chandos nashriyoti.
Mackey, TP va Jacobson, TE (2011). Axborot savodxonligini metall savodxonlik sifatida qayta ko’rib chiqish. Kollej va tadqiqot kutubxonalari, 72(1), 62–78.
