SITUATION OF TEACHING LINGUOCULTURAL UNITS IN SECONDARY EDUCATION
Norov Jamshid Nurulloevich, PhD student of Bukhara State Pedagogical Institute
Keywords:
school, literature, culture, linguistic culture, linguistic culture, allusion, reality, anthroponomy, pedagogy, methodologyAbstract
The article examines the goals and tasks of literature programs and education, analyzes the situation of teaching works of foreign writers in secondary schools, identifies the linguistic and cultural units in them, reveals the complications that arise in the process of teaching them, reveals the significance of the linguistic and cultural units in literature. critical views on their reflection and interpretation are expressed in textbooks, specific linguistic and cultural features of some linguistic and cultural units used in the language of foreign writers’ works, such as similes, metaphors, allusive names, realities, etc., are researched, their own and figurative meanings are studied in comparison with the unique artistic-aesthetic way of thinking, values and traditions of the Uzbek people, the factors of cultural-spiritual formation are determined, and the scientific method of applying them to literary education methodical system is defined, some recommendations are given regarding the method of teaching them. The article also analyzes issues such as the relationship of lingua-cultural studies with national thinking, consciousness, culture, spirituality, mentality, character, and language. It has been mentioned that it is appropriate to pay attention to the following in the teaching of linguistic and cultural units: these units should be taught in a way that is interconnected with the characteristics of a particular nation; special attention should be paid to the fact that peoples belonging to different languages understand and feel the world differently; it is necessary to understand that the characteristic of each language affects the mentality of that nation; scientific research in the field of pedagogy should be carried out in connection with the sciences of linguistics, history and philosophy.
References
Alefirenko N.F. (2010) Lingvokulturologiya: Sennostno-smislovoye prostranstvo yazika. -M.: Nauka. -288 s.
Arutyunova, N.D. (1999) Yazik i mir cheloveka. -M.: Nauka. -896 s.
Volkova, T.F. (2004) Sravneniya v rechi dialektnoy yazikovoy lichnosti: Dis. kand. ... filol. nauk. –Tomsk. -237 s.
Vorobev V.V. (1997) Lingvokulturologiya: teoriya i metodi. –Moskva.
Gumboldt V. fon. (1985) Yazik i filosofiya kulturi. Per. s nem./Sost. i obsh.red.A.V.Gulish,G.V.Ramishvili.– M.: Progress.
Zunnunov A., Hotamov N., Esonov J., Ibrohimov A. (1992) Adabiyot o‘qitish metodikasi. –Toshkent: O‘qituvchi. –332 b.
Ivanova S.V. (2003) Lingvokulturologicheskiy aspekt issledovaniya yazikovix yedinis: Diss. … d-ra filol. nauk. –Ufa.
Kambarova S. (2019) Umumiy o‘rta ta’lim tizimida o‘quvchilarning mustaqil mutolaa madaniyatini shakllantirish texnologiyasi: Ped. fan. b. falsafa dok. (PhD) diss. -Samarqand. -196 b.
Krasnix V.V. (2002) Etnopsixolingvistika i lingvokulturolgiya. -Moskva.
Maslova V.A. (2000) Lingvokulturologiya. -M.: Akademiya.
Saidov Yo. (2020) Lingvokulturologik tadqiqotlar metodologiyasi / Namangan davlat universiteti axborotnomasi. -Namangan. -№ 5. –B. 297-304.
Sepir E. (1993) Izbrannie trudi po yazikoznaniyu i kulturologii. -Moskva. –502 s.
To‘xliyev B. (2010) Adabiyot o‘qitish metodikasi. – Toshkent: Yangi asr avlodi. -157 b.
Xudoyberganova D. (2013) Matnning antropotsentrik tadqiqi. -T.: Fan. -83 b.